De Vivo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Max M. De Vivo
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2015cv01332
Filed: August 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Erica P. Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees, document 29 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/6/2018. (Rooney, M)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 8/31/2018 for the filing joint or separate supplemental submissions regarding the calculation of attorney fees, and specifically addressing the total amount of past-due benefits awarded to plaintiff. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/20/2018. (Rooney, M)
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request to modify the briefing schedule in re the motion for attorneys' fees. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/15/2018. (Rooney, M)
June 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses (ECF No. 27 ). IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,000.00, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/1/2017. (Rooney, M)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Final Judgment and Order re 1 Social Security Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/1/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
June 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING defendant's unopposed motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's opening brief, document 19 . Defendant's opposition is now due no later than 7/18/2016, with plaintiff's reply brief due, if any, by 8/2/2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/24/2016. (Rooney, M)
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 6/27/2016 for receipt of defendant's response to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, with all other deadlines extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/16/2016. (Rooney, M)
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/2/2015. (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De Vivo v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Max M. De Vivo
Represented By: Monica Perales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Henry L. Chi, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?