Smith v. Mirelez et al
James Smith |
Rudy Mirelez, Devan M. Portillo, Eugene Action and Kamala D. Harris |
1:2015cv01343 |
September 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Mariposa |
UnassignedDJ |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case without Leave to Amend signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/21/2017. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 4/10/2017.(Flores, E) |
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING the first amended complaint with leave to amend, document 8 , with the second amended complaint due by 11/14/2016. The Court further DISMISSES plaintiff's motion requesting to move forward with the case and for a subpoena, document 4 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/30/2016. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff is instructed to consider the standards set forth in this Order and should only file an amended complaint if he believes his claims are cognizable. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later than February 26, 2016. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint by the date specified will result in dismissal of this action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/12/2016. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/8/2015. (Jessen, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.