Arciga v. Frauenheim
Petitioner: Mario Arciga
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Case Number: 1:2015cv01372
Filed: September 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER vacating the Court's 11/21/22 ORDER granting Habeas Relief and dismissing Habeas Petition signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/16/2023. (Lundstrom, T)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER Vacating the Court's April 18, 2023 Order and Judgment signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/20/2023.(Flores, E)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER VACATING the Court's November 21, 2022 Order Granting Habeas Relief and Dismissing Habeas Petition, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/2023. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER DENYING 72 Respondent's Motion to Stay Pending Appeal signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/10/2023. (Lawrence, A)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER GRANTING 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/21/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER DENYING 57 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER Declining to Adopt 30 Findings and Recommendations in Part; Setting an Evidentiary Hearing on Petitioner's Batson Claim; and Referring Petition to the Federal Defender's Office signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/15/2022.(Flores, E)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Directing Respondent to Lodge Further Documents, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/24/18. Twenty-Eight Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/23/17. Objections to F&R Due Within Twenty-One Days. (Marrujo, C)
June 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER withdrawing 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/19/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
December 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Deny 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/9/16. Objections to F&R Due Within Twenty-One Days. (Marrujo, C)
September 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/9/2015. (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arciga v. Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mario Arciga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Represented By: Rebecca Leigh Whitfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?