Johnson v. City of Ridgecrest
| William Johnson |
| City of Ridgecrest |
| 1:2015cv01540 |
| October 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/27/2017. All pending dates, hearings and conferences are VACATED. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING 28 Stipulation to Extend Date for Filing Dispositive Pleadings, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/19/2017. Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 2/18/2017. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING 26 Stipulation to Continue Discovery Deadline for the Sole Purpose of Taking One Additional Deposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/2/2016. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/29/2016 ORDERING the parties joint request for leave for Plaintiff to file a First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Not later than 5 days following the date this order is electronically filed, Plaintiff is directed to file his First Amended Complaint. Defendant's Amended Answer shall be filed not later than 30 days after filing of the First Amended Complaint. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING 19 Stipulation to File the First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/29/2016. First amended complaint due by 7/5/2016. Defendant has 21 days from filing of first amended complaint to file a responsive pleading. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
18
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/22/2016. Pleading Amendment Deadline 6/24/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 12/12/2016; Expert 1/2/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 8/15/2016 at 08:30 AM in Bake rsfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/20/2017; Hearing by 2/17/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/20/2017; Hearing by 3/3/2017. Bench Trial set for 3/28/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 6 to Continue Rule 26 Conference of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/28/2015. (Hall, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. City of Ridgecrest | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Phyl Grace |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Potter |
| Represented By: | Dennis J. Price |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Ridgecrest | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
