Quiroga v. Medical Service Doctor et al
| Monico J. Quiroga |
| Medical Service Doctor, LVN and RN |
| 1:2015cv01871 |
| December 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER on Plaintiff's 79 Request for copies signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/18/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 77 Motion for excerpts of record signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/28/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
70
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 65 and to Deny Plaintiff's 64 MOTION to Deny Summary Judgment Settlement, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/21/18. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
66
SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment re 65 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/12/17. 21-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R) Modified on 12/13/2017 (Gonzalez, R).
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 62 Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline; Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: December 8, 2017 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/24/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER DENYING 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Copies of Documents Produced in Discovery and/or Subpoeaned signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/22/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER adopting 42 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to deny Plaintiff's Motion for injunctive relief 33 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/6/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER on Plaintiff's Discovery Motions to Compel Production of Documents, for Issuance of Subpoenas Duces Tecum, for Copying Costs, and for Sanctions 39 , 44 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/2/17. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
42
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Injunctive Relief, filed on March 3, 2017 33 , be DENIED ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 05/31/2017. Objections to F&R due : 21-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/27/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying and striking 30 Motion to submit additional inmate grievances signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/29/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL That Action Proceed Solely on Plaintiff's Deliberate Indifference Claim Against Defendant Dr. Hasta and That All Other Claims and Defendants be DISMISSED re 24 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/30/2016. Defendant Dr. Hasta added. RN, LVN and Medical Service Doctor terminated. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action Proceed on Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint on the First Cause of Action Against Defendant Dr. Hassta and All Other Claims and Defendants be DISMISSED With Prejudice re 20 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/10/2016. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
