Mathein v. Pier 1 Imports, Inc. et al
| Lauren Mathein |
| Pier 1 Imports, Inc. and Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. |
| 1:2016cv00087 |
| January 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Awarding Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Enhancement Awards, re 52 , 53 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/26/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Regarding Preliminarily Approved Class Settlement Administration Costs, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/12/2018. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 42 and 48 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/11/17. Hearing for Proposed Settlement is April 17, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Drozd in Courtroom 5. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Terminated Pier 1 Imports, Inc. From This Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/21/17. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS on or before 9/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/16/2017. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER on Plaintiff's 28 Application to Extend Page Limitation for Their Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Summary Adjudication, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/27/2017. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Joint Stipulation Extending Plaintiffs' Deadline to File a Motion for Class Certification, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/2/2017. (Court sets the following deadlines; discovery due by 4/21/2017, motion for class certification due by 5/19/2017, opposition due by 6/30/2017, any reply due by 7/21/2017, and Motion for Class Certification Hearing CONTINUED to 8/1/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 23 Joint Stipulation Extending Plaintiffs' Deadline to File a Motion for Class Certification, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/21/2016. (Class certification discovery deadline continued to 2/10/2017; Plaintiffs' ; motion for class certification is continued to 3/17/2017; Defendants' deadline to file an opposition 4/28/2017; Plaintiffs' reply if any due by 5/19/2017; Motion for Class Certification Hearing set for 6/6/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/2016. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff shall file her First Amended Complaint within seven (7) calendar days of the date this Order is filed; and Defendants response thereto shall be filed within twenty-eight (28) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/2016. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Recusal and vacating Scheduling Conference date signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/18/2016. New Case Number is 1:16-cv-00087-DAD-SAB.(Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
