Harmon et al v. Department of Justice et al
Joshua Harmon and Jenea Harmon |
Department of Justice, M. Haroldsen and Teresa Hannon |
1:2016cv00246 |
February 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER of DISMISSAL, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/27/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 42 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANTS' PERSONAL ASSETS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION UNTIL A RIGHT TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES IS ESTABLISHED signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on November 13, 2017. (ECF NO. 36) (Munoz, I) |
Filing 38 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION RE MOTION IN LIMINE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on November 6, 2017.(ECF NO. 24) (Munoz, I) |
Filing 23 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on November 1, 2017. (ECF NO. 21) (Munoz, I) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Dates and ORDER. The Court does not find good cause to extend non-expert discovery cut-off 60 days, considering expert discovery cut-off and other pretrial dates. The Court finds good cause to extend the discovery deadline, in light of scheduling conflicts, for 30 days until April 3, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/24/2017. (Thorp, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.