Owens v. Interstate Management Company LLC et al
Arthur Owens |
Interstate Management Company LLC and Bre Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC |
1:2016cv00305 |
March 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Tulare |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 sECOND STIPULATION for Extension of Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint and to Continue Scheduling Conference; ORDER: that Defendants, Interstate Management Company LLC dba Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner L LC, shall have to and including June 17, 2016 within which to file a responsive pleading. Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 6/1/2016 to July 28, 2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/17/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension of Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint in Excess of 28 days; ORDER that Defendants, Interstate Management Company LLCdba Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC, shall have to and including May 16, 2016 within which to file a responsive pleading. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/27/2016. (Herman, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.