Hanley v. Opinski et al
Plaintiff: Rolland Hanley
Defendant: Opinski, Binder and Deliemen
Case Number: 1:2016cv00391
Filed: March 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Merced
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Provide Current Address re 9 First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/10/2018. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
June 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER finding service of First Amended Complaint appropriate and forwarding service documents to Plaintiff for completion and return within 30-Days re 11 , 13 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
June 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER adopting 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for action to proceed on cognizable Fourteenth Amendment Claim and to dismiss non-cognizable claims signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/25/2018 for action to proceed on cognizable Fourteenth Amendment Claims and to dismiss non-cognizable claims 9 . Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R's due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
February 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to Provide a Current Address signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/17/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
October 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Either File an Amended Complaint OR a Notice of Willingness to Proceed on Cognizable Claim Against Defendant Sergeant Doe, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/18/16. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hanley v. Opinski et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rolland Hanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Opinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Binder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deliemen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?