Mendoza v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: Yolanda Mendoza
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 1:2016cv00406
Filed: March 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Merced
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO EXPERT DEADLINES IN CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 7/28/2023. (Apodaca, P)
March 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 136 CASE MANAGEMENT and SCHEUDLING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 03/24/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 11/27/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba; Jury Trial set for 1/23/2024 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba.(Flores, E)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER to File Joint Report; ORDER Setting Telephonic Second Status and/or Scheduling Conference; and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to File the February 2, 2022 Remand Order Issued in MDL No. 2741 (Doc. No. 2620) on the Docket signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 2/2/2023. Joint Report due by 3/9/2023. Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/23/2023 at 01:00 PM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Lawrence, A)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 109 COPY of SUGGESTION of REMAND to TRANSFEROR COURT, signed by United States District Judge Vince Chhabria (Northern District of California) on 01/24/2022. (Gonzalez, R)
October 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 108 TRANSFER ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California. MDL No. 2741. (Robles, S)
July 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER Denying Defendant's 73 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/7/2016. (Gaumnitz, R)
June 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER GRANTING defendant Monsanto Company's unopposed request to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 6/29/2016 and CONTINUING it to 8/17/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1 (SMS) before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/7/2016. (Rooney, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendoza v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Represented By: Richard A Clark
Represented By: Joe Hollingsworth, PHV
Represented By: Eric G Lasker, PHV
Represented By: Katharine R. Latimer, PHV
Represented By: Steven Robert Platt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda Mendoza
Represented By: Christopher Barton Dalbey
Represented By: Robin L Greenwald, PHV
Represented By: Kristie M Hightower, PHV
Represented By: Maja Lukic, PHV
Represented By: Hunter W Lundy, PHV
Represented By: Matthew E Lundy, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?