Berry v. Yosemite Community College District et al
| Debra Berry |
| Yosemite Community College District, Bryan Justin Marks, Jackie Jordan, Ellen Bambrosia, Iris Carol and Granden McCarthy |
| 1:2016cv00411 |
| March 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER re IFP Status on Appeal signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/15/2019. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER DENYING 83 Request to File Interlocutory Appeal; and Dismissing Case for Failure to Comply with Court Order to Pay Sanction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/18/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER adopting in part and modifying in part Findings and Recommendations re 67 , 68 , 72 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/20/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
72
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 1) Defendants' Motion for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Discovery Abuse and Violation of Court Order, (ECF No. 67) be granted to the extent Defendants seek terminating sanctions and dismissal of Pl aintiff's case with prejudice; 2) That Defendants' "Motion for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Discovery Abuse and Violation of Court Order," (ECF No. 67) be denied to the extent Defendants seeks attorneys' fees in addition to terminating sanctions; 3) That Plaintiff's "Counter Motion for Sanctions for Outrageous and Abusive Conduct During Discovery and Violation of Court Order" (ECF No. 68) be denied; 4) The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/3/2019. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/5/2019. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
64
Order directing further discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/5/2019. (Rosales, O.)
|
|
Filing
60
Order GRANTING IN PART Defendants' 48 Motion to Compel and Ordering further disclosures; Order modifying scheduling order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/30/2019. Plaintiff's list/statement due by 3/4/2019; Non expert disclosure due by 4/15/2019; Initial Expert Disclosure due by 6/17/2019; Expert Rebuttal/Supplemental due by 7/15/2019; Expert Discovery due by 8/12/2019; Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 8/26/2019; Dispositive Motions filed by 9/9/2019; Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Jury Trial set for 3/3/2020 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Rosales, O.)
|
|
Filing
57
Order DENYING 56 Third Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/15/2019. (Rosales, O.)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTNG, in part, defendants' ex parte application to modify the scheduling order or, in the alternative, to shorten time to hear a noticed motion to modify the scheduling order. Accordingly, the Court's scheduling order(s) are modif ied as follows: Initial Expert Disclosures due by 2/25/2019; Rebuttal/Supplemental Expert Disclosures due by 3/25/2019; Expert Discovery due by 4/29/2019; and Dispositive Motions filing deadline is extended to 5/28/2019; with all other dates to remain as previously set. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/10/2018. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
45
Order GRANTING IN PART Defendant's Ex Parte application to further modify the scheduling order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/29/2018. ( Expert Disclosure due by 1/14/2019; Expert Rebuttal/Supplemental Expert Disclosure due by 2/11/2019; Expert Discovery due by 4/8/2019; Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 5/6/2019) (Rosales, O)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING Motion to Appoint Counsel, document 38 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/20/2018. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DENYING plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, document 36 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/16/2018. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
31
Order setting mid-discovery status conference and modifying scheduling order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/3/2018. (Mid-discovery Status Conference set for 7/11/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean) (Rosales, O)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/25/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action proceed only on certain claims and certain defendants; this matter be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings including service of process re 1 Complaint ;referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/30/17. Objections to F&R : (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO EITHER FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED ONLY ON COGNIZABLE CLAIMS, Thirty (30) day deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/6/2017. (Lafata, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING 4 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/8/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
