Crew v. Commissioner of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
| David Crew |
| Commissioner of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
| 1:2016cv00590 |
| April 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal of Action, With Prejudice, for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute 52 , 55 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/9/2018: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute 52 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/29/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending Denial Without Prejudice of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Denial of Plaintiff's Related Motions in Opposition 53 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/27/2018: This action is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
53
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Denial without Prejudice Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Denial of Plaintiff's Related Motions in Opposition signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/03/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 4/20/2018.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to File Response to Plaintiff's 30 Motion to File an Emergency Amended Complaint; Twenty-One (21) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/13/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER DENYING Motion to Amend the Complain 27 ; ORDER DENYING Motion for Assignment of Counsel 28 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/1/17. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Compel Discovery Evidence as Premature signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/15/2016. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS PREMATURE 17 Motion to Compel, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/24/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/27/16. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crew v. Commissioner of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Crew | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
