Perryman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| William E Perryman |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Quality Loan Service Corporation |
| 1:2016cv00643 |
| May 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Foreclosure |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER Clarifying and Amending the Court's August 22, 2016 Order 16 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/19/16: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED; Chase's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED & DENIED IN PART; Case is REMANDED to Kings County Superior Court; The Clerk of This Court is DIRECTED to serve this order on the Kings County Superior Court and on the Kings County Superior Court Clerk of Court Jeffrey E. Lewis.(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand; GRANTING IN PART JP Morgan Chase Bank's Motion to Dismiss 8 , 10 ; REMANDING CASE to Kings County Superior Court, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/22/16: Certified Copy of remand order sent to other court. (CASE CLOSED) (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR INITIAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/19/2016. (Kusamura, W)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
