Ray Gibson v. Hagerty Insurance Agency et al
Ray Gibson |
Hagerty Insurance Agency and Essentia Insurance Company |
Hagerty Insurance Agency, LLC and Essentia Insurance Company |
Ray Gibson and Judy Slack |
1:2016cv00677 |
May 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Dale A. Drozd |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Hagerty Insurance Agency's and Essentia Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment 59 , 82 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/22/2019: This concludes the action in its entirety. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J) |
Filing 81 ORDER GRANTING Entry of Final Judgment as to Fewer Than All Claims and Parties Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/27/18. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 77 ORDER DENYING Request for Counsel 75 ; ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff Ray Gibson's Action for Failure to Obey Court Orders and Prosecute the Action 74 , 76 ; ORDER VACATING Scheduling Order and DIRECTING Defendants to File Status Report Within Seven (7) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/28/2018. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 74 ORDER Denying Request for Mediation (Doc. No. 71 ) and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey Court Orders and Prosecute this Action - TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McA uliffe on 6/4/2018. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson and Cross-Defendant Judy Slack's request for mediation is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff Ray Gibson is ORDERED to show cause in writing, within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order, why his complaint should not be dismissed in its entirety based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's orders and Plaintiff's failure to prosecute his action. (3) The failure to respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. (Valdez, E) |
Filing 72 ORDER Directing Defendants Hagerty Insurance Agency and Essentia Insurance Agency to File a Reply to Request for Mediation 71 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/23/18. Seven-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 70 ORDER GRANTING Motion to Extend Stay (Doc. 69). The stay of proceedings in this action is hereby extended for an additional thirty (30) days, through and including May 19, 2018. Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson is ORDERED to either (1) retain new counsel and file a proper notice for substitution or (2) notify the Court of Plaintiff's request to dismiss his action against Defendants on or before May 19, 2018. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/19/2018. (Herman, H) |
Filing 68 ORDER GRANTING 60 Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel of Record for Ray Gibson and Judy Slack ; ORDER STAYING Action for Thirty (30) Days; ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Ray Gibson to obtain counsel within thirty (30) Days or Dismis s Action; ORDER VACATING Hearing on Defendants' 59 Motion for Summary Judgment,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/19/18. CASE STAYED (Case Management Deadline: 4/18/2018); Attorney Anthony T. Salazar terminated. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 57 ORDER REASSIGNING Case, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/13/17. NEW CASE NUMBER: 1:16-cv-00677-BAM. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 55 ORDER to File Consent or Decline Form or ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and for Failure to Prosecute This Action 54 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/1/17: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from October 11, 2016 to Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. A joint scheduling report is due one week before the conference. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/4/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 23 ORDER Continuing Initial Scheduling Conference; ORDER Directing Attorney Anthony T. Salazar to File Substitution of Attorney Form, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/2/16. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/11/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 20 ORDER Continuing Initial Schedule Conference: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued to September 1, 2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. ORDER Directing Parties to File Consent/Declne Forms . the parties have represented that they would consent to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). Accordingly, no later than August 31, 2016, the parties are ORDERED to file their consent forms indicating whether they consent to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send consent/decline forms to Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Ray Gibson and Cross Defendant Judy Slack. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/10/2016. (Herman, H) |
Filing 14 ORDER re 10 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/26/16. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 8 FIRST INFORMATIONAL ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/5/16. (Gonzalez, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.