Mitchell v. Security Pacific Bank et al
| Hursel Floyd Mitchell |
| Security Pacific Bank, Federal Credit Union, First Interstate Bank, Bank of America, Citibank, Valley Oak Bank and JP Morgan Chase |
| 1:2016cv00775 |
| June 3, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Madera |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED Without Leave to Amend, and that the Action be Closed re 10 First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/14/2017. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 1 , THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/9/2017. (Lafata, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 4 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/7/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/11/2016. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER REQUESTING Additional Information RE: Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Application signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/8/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
