Mike Murphy's Enterprises, Inc. v. Fineline Industries, LLC
| Mike Murphy's Enterprises, Inc. |
| Fineline Industries, LLC |
| 1:2016cv00784 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to CLOSE CASE and Adjust the Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/22/2024. CASE CLOSED.(Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING 72 Motion to Withdrawal as Counsel for Plaintiff and ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Acquire New Representation and File a Notice of Appearance by New Counsel Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2024. Attorney Alan Heimlich terminated. (Lawrence, A)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/27/2023. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the February 23, 2022 order to show cause (ECF No. 65 ) is DISCHARGED. The parties' next joint status report shall be filed < b>no later than 90 days from the date of electronic filing of this order. Thereafter, a joint status report shall be filed every 90 days from the date of electronic filing of the prior status report, until the stay is lifted. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.(Gonzales, V)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE STATUS REPORT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2023. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the parties shall show cause in writing within two (2) days of the date of entry of this order why monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to file a status report as ordered, in addition to providing a status report. Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. (Gonzales, V)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/29/2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report within five (5) days of the date of entry of this order. Th ereafter, the parties shall file a status report every ninety (90) days from the date of filing of the last status report until the stay is lifted. The failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Gonzales, V)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the date of entry of this order; and the failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/1/2019. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the date of entry of this order; and the parties shall file a joint status report every ninety days from the date of filing of the last status report until the stay is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/2/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Requiring Parties to file Joint Status Report withing Five Days of the Date of this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/10/2017. It is hereby ordered that: The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the date of entry of this order; and the parties shall file a joint status report every ninety days from the date of filing of the last status report until the stay is lifted. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 14, 2016 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE STATUS REPORTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/2/2016. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER re Defendants' 17 Motion to Stay and Plaintiff's 18 Motion to Strike, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/31/16. CASE STAYED. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM Decision and ORDER re Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/4/16. (Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mike Murphy's Enterprises, Inc. v. Fineline Industries, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mike Murphy's Enterprises, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alan Heimlich |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Donovan Heimlich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fineline Industries, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian R. Gilchrist, PHV |
| Represented By: | Matthew W. Quall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
