Thornton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jenyne Ann Thornton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2016cv00816
Filed: June 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION and ORDER for Award of Attorneys Fees; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 37 Motion for Attorney's Fees as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 06/07/2018. (Flores, E)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER Directing Entry of Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Jenyne Ann Thorton and Against Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/5/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/17/17. Opposition due by 8/18/2017. (Marrujo, C)
August 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/8/17. Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is extended from August 7, 2017 to August 16, 2017. (Marrujo, C)
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/31/2017. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 26 ), Defendant's Opposition shall be filed no later than August 4, 2017. Any Reply shall be filed fifteen days after the filing of the Opposition. (Valdez, E)
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/18/2017. (Flores, E)
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER on Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/16/17: Response deadline EXTENDED from June 19, 2017 to July 19, 2017. (Hellings, J)
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING Amended Application to Proceed IFP 4 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/15/16. (Hellings, J)
June 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DENYING 2 Application to Proceed IFP with Leave to Amend signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/14/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jenyne Ann Thornton
Represented By: Melissa Newel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?