Edwards v. Magallanes et al
| Steven R. Edwards |
| Magallanes, M. Grajeda, Moon, McGrew, Khin Aye and Bowechop |
| 1:2016cv00975 |
| July 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment in Favor of Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/5/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 27 Motion for Summary Judgment, without prejudice, for failure to provide the appropriate Rand Notice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/6/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 34 Motion for Reconsideration and Amendment to September 7, 2018 Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/25/18. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Following in Camara Review of Documentation Submitted in Response to the Court's July 27, 2018, Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/07/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 , 25 Motions to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/27/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
