Newman v. County of Fresno, et al.
| Trisha Newman |
| County of Fresno, Fresno County Sheriff's Department and Hernandez |
| 1:2016cv01099 |
| July 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING Motion for Summary Judgment 19 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/20/2018: The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment as to the § 1983 claims and close this case. (CASE CLOSED) (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation to Continue Certain Scheduled Dates, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/4/2017. (Pretrial Conference previously set for 11/20/2017, is CONTINUED to 5/21/2018, at 01:30 PM, and Jury Trial previously set for 1/23/2018, is CONTINUED to 7/24/2018, at 08:30 AM, both in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AUTHORIZING LIMITED DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/4/2017. (Lafata, M)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER to Augment the Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/1/2017. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
15
ADDENDUM TO SCHEDULING ORDER 14 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/27/2017. (Kusamura, W)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
