Kerzich v County of Tuolumne
| Mark Kerzich and Timothy Wertz |
| County of Tuolumne |
| 1:2016cv01116 |
| July 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER APPROVING Revised FLSA 71 Settlement and Dismissing Action With Prejudice, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/19. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Requiring Parties to File a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement or Notice that Matter has not Settled signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/06/2018. Filing Deadline: 10/29/2018.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference (set for September 5, 2018 at 10:00 am before Judge McAuliffe), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/28/2018. PERSONAL Appearance by Plaintiff and Defense Counsel Required. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF FLSA SETTLEMENT, 58 . Plaintiffs' motion for approval of this FLSA settlement (Doc. No. 58) is denied without prejudice to the parties attempting to settle this action in a manner that remedies the deficiencies identified. The case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further scheduling. Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/2018. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Directing Further Briefing, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/6/2018. (Plaintiffs are granted 28 days from the date of service of this order to file and serve a supplemental memorandum in support of its motion for approval addressing the court's questions as well as any other matters that may aid the court in resolution of the pending motion.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Terminate Action as to Plaintiff's Sharon Beuttler, Lynda Johnson, and Elizabeth Nadolny only signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 01/24/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT OF COLLECTIVE ACTION. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for preliminary approval of the collective action settlement shall be filed on or before February 2, 2018; and a hearing shall be set before District Judge Dale A. Drodz pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/23/2018. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 1, 2016 scheduling order is AMENDED as follows: Deadline for expert disclosure: October 11, 2017; Deadline for supplemental expert disclosure: October 30, 2017; Deadline to complete expert discovery: November 13, 2017; All other aspects of the November 1, 2016 scheduling order remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/22/2017. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference (set for October 2, 2017 at 9:30 am before Judge McAuliffe). PERSONAL Appearance by Plaintiff and Defense Counsel Required. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/18/2017. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/9/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation for Conditional Certification and Approval of Class Notice, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/24/2017. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
