Smith v. Fantone et al
| Trayvone Smith |
| Emmanuel J. Fantone and Jaswant Khokhar |
| 1:2016cv01179 |
| August 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Erica P. Grosjean |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23 , 24 & 53 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/23/2018: This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
53
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Claims Consistent With Magistrate Judge's Prior Order in Light of Williams Decision 23 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/22/2018: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
50
DISCOVERY ORDER Following Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/16/2018. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER on stipulated request for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/16/2018. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/7/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this Case Should Not be Dismissed without Prejudice for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/4/17. Show Cause Response Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
