Jones v. Arnette, et al.
Jeremy Jones |
Arnette, Flores, Lopez, Zamora, Vasquez, Gonzalez, Keener and Kim |
1:2016cv01212 |
August 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Gary S. Austin |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 143 ORDER DENYING 141 Plaintiff's Motion to Review and Correct Deposition Transcript, and Granting Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/06/2023. Opposition due by 9/29/2023. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 140 ORDER GRANTING 139 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/12/2023. Plaintiff is granted until 8/18/2023, in which to file his opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on 5/12/2023. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 137 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 135 Motion to Compel as Untimely and Deficient; ORDER DENYING Defendants' 136 Request for Extension of Time as MOOT signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/6/2023. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 132 ORDER for Clerk to Issue New Discovery and Scheduling Order, Reopening Discovery and Setting New Deadlines for All Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/10/2022. (Lawrence, A) |
Filing 131 ORDER ADOPTING 122 Findings and Recommendations in Full; ORDER DISMISSING Defendants Vasquez and Lopez from this Case Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Effect Service, signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 9/6/2022. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings, including the issuance of a new scheduling order. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 129 ORDER DENYING 126 Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/14/2022. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 127 ORDER Requiring Defendants to Notify Court whether a Settlement Conference would be beneficial, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 06/7/2022. (Filing Deadline: 30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 125 ORDER DENYING 123 Motion for Reconsideration; ORDER Submitting Plaintiff's Objections to the Findings and Recommendations to the District Judge for Consideration signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/30/2022. (Flores, E) |
Filing 122 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending That Defendants Vasquez and Lopez be Dismissed From This Case Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Effect Service, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/31/2022. Objections to F&R due within FOURTEEN DAYS. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 121 ORDER DENYING 118 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/31/2022. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 117 ORDER for Plaintiff to provide information sufficient to identify Defendants Vasquez and Lopez and locate them for service of process signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/2/2021. 21-Day Deadline. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 115 ORDER denying Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default 98 ; ORDER discharging Order to Show Cause 99 ; ORDER for Defendant Zamora to file a Response to the Second Amended Complaint within 30-Days 33 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/22/2021. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 114 ORDER DENYING Motion for Reconsideration 112 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/21/2021. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 111 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 97 and for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Request for Production #3 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/15/2021. 30-Day Deadline. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 110 ORDER GRANTING Defendants Arnett, Flores, Gonzales, and Keener's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order 109 ; ORDER VACATING Deadlines in Court's Discovery and Scheduling Order Pending Resolution of Issues, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/14/2021. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 108 ORDER DENYING 107 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/23/2021. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 105 ORDER GRANTING 103 Defendant Zamora's Request by Special Appearance for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/20/2021. Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 102 ORDER GRANTING 101 Defendants' Request for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/31/2021. Defendants are granted an extension of time until 9/1/2021 in which to respond to Plaintiff's second set of requests for production of documents . (Rivera, O) |
Filing 99 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/06/2021. Show Cause Response due within Thirty-Days. (Flores, E) |
Filing 95 ORDER for Plaintiff to Provide Information Sufficient to Identify Defendants Vasquez and Lopez and to Identify Their Location(s) for Service of Process signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/17/2021. 45-day deadline. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 93 ORDER granting MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order 88 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/1/2021. Discovery due by 8/5/2021. Dispositive Motions filed by 10/5/2021. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 85 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 75 Motion to Compel in Part; ORDER for Defendants to Provide Further Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents #1 and #2 within Thirty Days signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/22/2021. (Flores, E) |
Filing 80 ORDER DENYING 78 Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/22/2021. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 79 ORDER ADOPTING 70 Findings and Recommendations and Denying Plaintiff's 62 Motion For Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/19/2021. Case Referred back to Magistrate Judge. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 77 ORDER GRANTING 74 Defendants Arnett, Flores, Gonzales, and Keener's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order; ORDER EXTENDING Discovery Deadline and Deadline to File Dispositive Motions for All Parties, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/8/2021. New Discovery Deadline: 6/5/2021. New Dispositive Motions Deadline: 8/5/2021. All other provisions of the courts 11/6/2020 Discovery and Scheduling Order remain the same. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 72 ORDER for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendants Lopez and Vasquez Should not be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Effect Service signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/24/202. Show Cause Response due within Thirty Days.(Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 70 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending That Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief be Denied, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/3/2021. Objections to F&R due within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 66 ORDER DISCHARGING 64 Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/4/2021. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 64 ORDER for CDCR to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's 6/8/2020 Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/22/2021. Show Cause Response due within 20-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING 36 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/4/2020. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 44 ORDER granting Request for Status 43 and for Clerk to send Plaintiff a copy of his docket sheet signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/20/2019. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS re 33 Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/9/2018. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.