Patterson v. Martinez
Vester L. Patterson |
Joel Martinez and Scott Kernan |
1:2016cv01215 |
August 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Tuolumne |
Stanley A. Boone |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 22 Petitioner's Motion for Default be DENIED, 20 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and the Amended Petition be DISMISSED re 10 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2017. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 21 ORDER Denying Petitioner's 19 Rule 72(a) Motion, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/14/16. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 18 ORDER Denying Petitioner's 17 Motion to Expedite Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/24/2016. (Flores, E) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING 11 Motion to Amend; ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to 10 First Amended Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/11/2016. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 12 ORDER for Respondent to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Moiton to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/30/16. (Case Management Deadline: 10/7/2016) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.