Torres v. Gipson et al
Juan Matias Torres |
Connie Gipson, L. Clausell, D. Case, A. Mayo, T. Galaviz, K. Matta, L. Williams, J. C. Smith, D. Babineaux-Prince and C. Henderson |
1:2016cv01525 |
October 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Michael J. Seng |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 ORDER ADOPTING 121 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 99 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 121 ORDER DENYING 105 Plaintiff's Motion to Declare Defendants' Declarations Shams; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 99 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED re 16 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/3/2021. Referred to Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 115 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 104 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition; And ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 114 Motion for Extension of Time to File Sur-Reply, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/16/2020. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 113 ORDER DENYING 92 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/25/2020. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 112 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 110 Motion to File a Sur-Reply signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/24/2020. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 91 ORDER LIFTING Stay; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 89 Motion for Settlement Conference; ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 87 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order; and AMENDED Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/21/19. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 86 ORDER Adopting 81 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Defendants' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/12/19. Matter Referred Back to Magistrate Judge. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 81 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 64 be DENIED for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies; ORDER GRANTING 65 , 78 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; ORDER DENYING 66 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Resolution of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 04/12/2019. (14-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 77 ORDER Granting in Part Plaintiff's 76 Motion for Extension of Time and Granting Defendants' Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and Stay Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 02/14/2019. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Flores, E) |
Filing 59 ORDER Requiring Parties to Notify Court Whether a Settlement Conference would be Beneficial signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/24/2018. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E) |
Filing 58 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 56 Motion to Strike signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/18/2018. (Flores, E) |
Filing 54 ORDER denying 48 Motion for Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/20/2018. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER GRANTING 26 Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss, this action shall proceed only on Plaintiffs claims for First Amendment retaliation against Defendants Smith, Prince, Henderson, Mayo, Galaviz, and Weaver, all other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED; ORDER GRANTING 45 Motion for Extension; Case to Remain Open, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/13/2018. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 40 ORDER Adopting 34 Findings and Recommendation Dismissing Defendant L. Williams Pursuant to FRCP 4(m), signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/25/18. L. Williams (Classification Staff Representative) terminated. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Defendants' Partial 26 Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/16/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 5/3/2018.(Flores, E) |
Filing 36 ORDER Denying 32 Motion Requesting a Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/09/2018. (Flores, E) |
Filing 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendant L. Williams be Dismissed From This Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 4(m) re 16 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/1/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 24 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Certain Defendant should not be Dismissed; Show Cause Response due within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/7/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 22 ORDER DIRECTING United States Marshals Service to Re-Attempt Service on Defendant L. Williams Without Prepayment of Costs and to Contact CDCR for Assistance in Attempting to Execute Service, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/5/17. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 11 ORDER re 10 Request for Update and Case Inquiry and Request for Extension of Time; Order Discharging Order to Show Cause 9 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/1/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 9 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re Address Change signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/18/2017. Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.