Rhodes v. County of Madera et al
| Benjamin Rhodes |
| County of Madera, Madera County District Attorney's Office, David Linn, Michael Kietz, John - Anderson, Nicolas Fogg and Robert Blehm |
| 1:2016cv01631 |
| October 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Madera |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be Dismissed Without Leave to Amend for Failure to State a Claim. Matter referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/19/2017. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with 30 days Leave to Amend. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a first a mended complaint; and if Plaintiff fails to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this order, this action will be recommended for dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/3/2017. (Thorp, J)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/15/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
