Hopson v. Walgreens Company, et al.
| Cynthia Hopson |
| Gurmukh S Gill, Sahota Pardeep and Walgreens Company |
| 1:2016cv01678 |
| November 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Erica P. Grosjean |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Close the Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/20/17. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATION Regarding Continuance of Pretrial Scheduling Conference and ORDER Granting Thereof signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/14/2017: It is hereby ordered, that the Initial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 3/20/2017, at 9:30 am until 5/22/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 2/9/2017 and CONTINUING it to 3/20/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Telephoni c appearances are granted at said conference, with each party directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/2/2017. (Rooney, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
