Gaines v. Virk et al
Mary Lee Gaines |
P. Virk, Seretona, Hoehing, R. Ybarra, S. Lwin, Edward, Ray, Voltz, Martinez and J. Rhodes |
1:2016cv01689 |
November 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Madera |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Jennifer L. Thurston |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 ORDER ADOPTING 69 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 55 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/21/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 69 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant 55 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust re 24 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/5/2020. Referred to Unassigned DJ; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 64 ORDER GRANTING 63 Defendants' Motion to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/13/2020. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING 61 Plaintiff's Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to 55 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/14/2020. Opposition due within 30 days. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 60 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 59 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 04/15/2020. ( Case Management Deadline: 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 51 ORDER ADOPTING 45 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING Defendant's 42 Motion Order Requiring Plaintiff to Post Security, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/04/2020. (Orozco, A) |
Filing 45 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to DENY Defendant's 42 Motion for Order Requiring Plaintiff to Post Security, filed by Correctional Officer Beaver; Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/10/2019. Objections to F&R due within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS. (Orozco, A) |
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 43 Motion to Stay Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/12/2019. (Orozco, A) |
Filing 40 ORDER DENYING 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/18/2019. (Flores, E) |
Filing 33 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motions to Extend Time to Respond to Order to Show Cause Nunc Pro Tunc and Discharging 28 Order to Show Cause; Clerk to Forward Service Documents to U.S. Marshal, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/5/19. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 28 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action should not be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with the Court's Order and to Prosecute this Action; Show Cause Response due within Twenty-One (21) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/9/2019. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 27 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; ORDERED to Re-Serve Plaintiff a copy of the order directing Plaintiff to submit service documents 25 and to remove Ms. Huang from the docket, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/6/19. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 23 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL for a Limited Purpose signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/18/2018. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 19 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply With the Court's Order and to Prosecute This Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/30/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.