Leslie v. Madrigal et al
| Deshawn D. Leslie |
| Oscar M. Madrigal and Darren Brown |
| 1:2016cv01698 |
| May 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER on Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 06/10/2019. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER DENYING 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Striking Reply to Defendants' Answer signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/29/2019. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING without prejudice 53 Motion to Initiate Discovery Proceedings ; ORDER GRANTING 54 Motion for Extension of Time,signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/21/2019. ( Objections to F&R due 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/7/2019: Settlement Conference set for 6/6/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Answer [49, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/6/2019. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's 41 Motion for Leave to Supplement or to File an Amended Complaint and to Deny 40 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/19/19. Objections to F&R Due Twenty One Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 36 , 37 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/19/2019: Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY DENIED, without prejudice and his motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DISREGARDED as moot. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding 29 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/13/2019. Fourth Amended Complaint due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
34
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/3/2019: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Third Amended Complaint re 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/23/18. Response Deadline: 7/9/2018. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/27/2017 granting 19 Motion for leave to correct the record and withdrawing 18 Order Directing USM to serve the Second Amended Complaint. (Third Amended Complaint due within 21 Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply With the Court's Order 1 , 12 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/8/17: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING First Amended Complaint, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/14/17. Amended Complaint Due Within Twenty-One Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:16-cv-1035 AC P) to Fresno (1:16-cv-1698 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/08/16. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
