Denell Caver v. Ceballos et al
Denell Caver |
J. Ceballos and B. Rodriguez |
1:2016cv01885 |
December 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER VACATING Settlement Conference and DISCHARGING 22 Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Produce Inmate Denell Caver, CDCR#T-10792, via Video Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/12/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 22 ORDER & WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Produce Plaintiff Denell Caver, CDC #T-10792 by Video Conference on 10/24/2017, at 10:30 a.m., signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/26/2017. (Flores, E) |
Filing 21 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 19 20 Motion to have Alternative Dispute Resolution Via Telephone Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/26/2017. Confidential Settlement Statements due by 10/17/2017. (Flores, E) |
Filing 18 ORDER Denying 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel; ORDER Denying 16 Motion for Entry of Default signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/11/2017. (Flores, E) |
Filing 17 ORDER Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and Staying Case for 90 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/11/2017. Settlement Conference set for 10/24/2017 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Case stayed.(Flores, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.