In re: Martin Ware
Defendant: Special Appearance
Case Number: 1:2016mc00049
Filed: September 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Stanley A. Boone
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REGARDING ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC CASE FILING SYSTEM, DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, AND DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/13/2016. NO FURTHER FILINGS SHOULD BE FILED IN THIS ACTION. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)
September 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Regarding Use of Electronic Submission of Prison Litigation, Directing Appearance by Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Setting Briefing Schedule 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/22/16.(Hellings, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Martin Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Special Appearance
Represented By: Monica Noella Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?