In re: Martin Ware
Special Appearance |
1:2016mc00049 |
September 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Stanley A. Boone |
Other |
No cause code entered |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REGARDING ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC CASE FILING SYSTEM, DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, AND DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/13/2016. NO FURTHER FILINGS SHOULD BE FILED IN THIS ACTION. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 2 ORDER Regarding Use of Electronic Submission of Prison Litigation, Directing Appearance by Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Setting Briefing Schedule 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/22/16.(Hellings, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In re: Martin Ware | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Special Appearance | |
Represented By: | Monica Noella Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.