Cunha v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
| James Alfred Cunha |
| California Forensic Medical Group, Stanislaus County Jail, Mike Dailey, GSA Services, Barbara, Tonya, Joe C., Vince Truffa and Chad Blake |
| 1:2017cv00094 |
| January 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/18/17. 14-Day Objection Deadline. Referred to Judge Drozd. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Discharging 17 Order to Show Cause signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/02/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Vacating ECF 15 ; CORRECTED ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Either an Amended Complaint, a Request for Reconsideration, a Notice of Appeal, or a Statement of Intent to Stand on his First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/16/17. 14-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File either an Amended Complaint or a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to 14 Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 06/14/17. (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
