HH-Fresno LLC v. City of Fresno et al
HH-Fresno LLC |
City of Fresno and Development and Resource Management Department |
1:2017cv00163 |
February 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, with Prejudice signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/19/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E) |
Filing 19 ORDER FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT; VACATING DATES; DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE DISPOSITIVE DOCUMENTS; AND DIRECTING THAT STAY SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. Based upon the settlement of this action, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: All pending matters and dates in this ac tion are VACATED; The parties shall file dispositional documents within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order; The undersigned shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by the parties should an issue arise before dismissal; and The stay issued by Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on March 7, 2017 (ECF No. 15) is to remain in effect for an additional 21 days from todays date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/28/2017. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR MARCH 28, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/7/2017. (Hernandez, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.