Larry v. Goodwin, et al.
Plaintiff: Jerald Morris Larry
Defendant: S Goodwin and Reis
Case Number: 1:2017cv00172
Filed: February 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Giving Full Effect to Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, With Prejudice, Under Rule 41 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/26/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Following Settlement, Vacating Dates and Directing Parties to File Dispositive Documents Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/16/2018. (Jessen, A)
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER That Inmate Jerald Morris Larry is No Longer Needed as a Witness in These Proceedings and the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is Discharged signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/16/2018. (Jessen, A)
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to transport inmate, Jerald Morris Larry, CDC No. AR-2424 for a Settlement Conference set for 11/16/2018 @ 10.00 am signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/18/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER setting Settlement Conference for 11/16/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/14/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER EXTENDING Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline from December 20, 2018 to January 21, 2019 for all Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/30/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
January 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/19/2018. This action now proceeds with plaintiff's complaint filed on February 8, 2017 against defendants S. Goodwin and Reis. (Jessen, A)
October 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that this Action Proceed Only Against Defendants Goodwin and Reis, on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Conditions of Confinement Claims, and that all Other Claims and Defendants be Dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/31/17. Objections, if any, Due in 14 Days. Referred to Judge Drozd. (Gonzalez, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larry v. Goodwin, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerald Morris Larry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Goodwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?