Arvizu, et al. v. Hugler, et al.
Ileana S Arvizu and I.S.A. Contracting Services, Inc. |
Edward C Hugler and Ruben Rosalez |
1:2017cv00219 |
February 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Erica P. Grosjean |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/20/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER re Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/9/17. Amended Complaint Due Within Twenty Days. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time for Response to Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/19/2017. The Court finds good cause to extend by fourteen (14) days the time for defendants' response to the amended Complaint, to June 29, 2017. (Valdez, E) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of the following deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 5/15/2017; Response to Amended Complaint due by 6/15/2017; and the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 5/31/2017 is CONTINUED to 7/24/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/2/2017. (Rooney, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.