McCrea v. Hubbard et al
| Terrence McCrea |
| J. Hubbard and C. Denman |
| 1:2017cv00247 |
| February 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Certain Claims signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/08/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER REINSTATING DISMISSED CLAIMS 10 ; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Hubbard be Dismissed and this action proceed on Plaintiff's cognizable claim for retaliation against Defendant Denma n re 9 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Terrence McCrea ; referred to Judge Drozd; new case number is 1:17-cv-247 DAD-MJS (PC),signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/11/17. Objections to F&R due by 12/29/2017 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Copy of Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/28/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Requiring the Parties to Address the Implications of Recent Ninth Circuit Opinion on Defendant's Motion to Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/13/2017. Reply Brief due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
