Trujillo v. Khounpaseuth et al
| Jose Trujillo |
| Chansury Khounpaseuth, Arich Ath Syprasert and Boualiene Sypraert |
| 1:2017cv00388 |
| March 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER Directing Clerk of the Court to Close Case and Adjust Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/17/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS (ECF No. 20 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/10/2017. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall file dispositional documents on or before October 17, 2017. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Requiring the Parties to File Dispositional Documents (Deadline: 10/9/2017), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/6/17. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Re Stipulation GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/1/17: 5-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/17. New Case Number: 1:17-cv-00388-SAB. (Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
