Peterson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
| Erika Peterson |
| Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC |
| 1:2017cv00499 |
| April 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER of DISMISSAL 25 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/13/2018: This action has been dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative Class, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the parties will bear their own respective costs and expenses. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
23
SCHEDULING ORDER. The parties are ordered to have exchanged the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before August 18, 2017. Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed by no later th an December 13, 2017. Class certification discovery shall be completed by no later than March 2, 2018. Expert witnesses opining on issues of class certification shall be disclosed by January 19, 2018. Rebuttal expert witnesses shall be disclosed by February 16, 2018. The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than April 6, 2018. Any opposition to the motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than May 4, 2018. Any reply brief in support of the motion fo r class certification shall be filed by no later than May 18, 2018. The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than June 6, 2018, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. ONeill, Chief United States District Judge. A mid-discovery status conference to set further scheduling dates, as needed, is set for August 7, 2018, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/23/2017. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING Second Extension of Time for Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC shall file its responsive pleading by no later than June 14, 2017. This extension does not impact or change any event or deadline already set by the Court. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/5/2017. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peterson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erika Peterson | |
| Represented By: | Adrian R. Bacon |
| Represented By: | Todd M. Friedman |
| Represented By: | Meghan George |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
