Murray v. McKay, et al.
| Wesley Thomas Murray |
| Marsha McKay, Tuolumne County Sheriff's Department, Tamara McCaig and Joan Lenerd |
| 1:2017cv00564 |
| April 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tuolumne |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Action for Failure to Obey a Court Order, Failure to Prosecute, and Failure to State a Claim; Clerk to Re-Open Case signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/13/2017. referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 11/30/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION for Failure to Obey a Court Order, Failure to Prosecute, and Failure to State a Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/06/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 09/28/2017. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-0800 KJN PC) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0564 MJS PC) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/2017; this court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
