Reilly et al v. Adventist Health et al
Case Number: 1:2017cv00613
Filed: July 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 54 AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Entry of Judgment and Request for Stay; DISMISSING claims against remaining Defendants; and Closing Case, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/2/2020(Martin-Gill, S)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER DISMISSING CASE ORDER DENYING 52 Motion for Entry of Judgment and Request for Stay; ORDERED that all claims against Paul Griffin are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/20/2020. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER TERMIATING Certain Defendants and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Regarding Dismissal of Claims Against Other Defendants, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/30/2020. (Marrujo, C)
May 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING 35 Defendants Adventist Health, San Joaquin Community Hospital, Robert Beehler, Kurt Hoekendorf, Scott Reiner And William Brent Sopers Motion To Dismiss Relators First Amended Complaint, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/15/2020. Amended Complaint due within 21 days. (Rivera, O)
April 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/30/2020 to 7/2/2020 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/6/2020. (Kusamura, W)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 45 THIRD JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE and ORDER. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (Doc. 44 ), the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for February 20, 2020, is CONTINUED to April 30, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report by no later than April 23, 2020. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/30/2020. (Apodaca, P)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 SECOND JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/26/2019 is CONTINUED to 2/20/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/6/2019. (Kusamura, W)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/8/2019 is CONTINUED to 11/26/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/10/2019. (Kusamura, W)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER Following Notice of Appearance and Expiration of Stay signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/3/2019. Plaintiff shall serve the First Amended Complaint, as well as a copy of this order, on Defendants. This order, as well as all further filings in this case, will not be filed under seal. (Jessen, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reilly et al v. Adventist Health et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?