Voss v. Baker
| Craig William Voss |
| Brian Baker |
| 1:2017cv00626 |
| May 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Erica P. Grosjean |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER Dismissing Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(A)(1), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/13/19. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER authorizing service of 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint on Brian Baker and directing Clerk to complete service documents signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/18/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel re 53 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/10/18. 21-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Requiring Status Report signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 05/10/2018. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Directing Service of Subpoena by the United States Marshals Service Without Prepayment of Costs re 44 , 45 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/5/18. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motions to Withdraw re 19 , 20 , 35 , 40 , 41 and Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Upon California Department of Motor Vehicles re 42 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/13/18. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Adopting 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/19/18. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER on Plaintiff's 30 Motion Requesting Copy of Proof of Service and Demand for USMS to Produce Process Receipt; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Copy of Filed USM-285 Form signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/26/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Dismiss Claims Consistent with Magistrate Judge's Prior Order in Light of Williams Decision; Objections, if any, Due within Fourteen (14) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/14/2017. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due by 1/2/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER on Plaintiff's 24 Motion Requesting Status of and/or Ruling on Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum on Non-Party CDCR signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/27/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Directing Service of Subpoena by the United States Marshals Service without Prepayment of Costs signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/06/2017. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Voss v. Baker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Craig William Voss | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brian Baker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
