Godoy v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Office et al
Frank Godoy |
Sacramento County Sheriff's Office, M. Oliveira, A. Leyva, D. Hernandez and J. C. Smith |
1:2017cv00809 |
June 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Gary S. Austin |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED 20 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action for Failure to Comply with a Court Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/31/2019. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E) |
Filing 20 AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending that this Case be Dismissed for Failure to Comply with Court Order re 14 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/9/19. Objections, If Any, Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that this Case be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim; Objections, if any, Due in Fourteen (14) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/25/2019. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 16 ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/9/2018: Motion is DENIED, without prejudice. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/1/2018: Motion is DENIED, without prejudice. (Hellings, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.