Mosley v. Stewart
Plaintiff: Quincy Mosley
Defendant: S. Stewart
Case Number: 1:2017cv00852
Filed: June 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING 49 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING Defendants' 47 Motion for Summary Judgment Due to Plaintiff's Failure Exhaust Administrative Remedies, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/11/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 49 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Defendant's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/13/2021. Objections to F&R due within FOURTEEN DAYS. (Marrujo, C)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER to File Response to Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/18/2021. Response or notice of non-opposition due within 21 days. (Rivera, O)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER LIFTING STAY and Directing the Clerk of the Court is Directed to Issue a Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/13/2021. (Jessen, A)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 90 DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/6/2020. (Lundstrom, T)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DIRECTING Defendant to SUBMIT Report of Status; Ten-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/14/2020. (Sant Agata, S)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Granting the Defendants' 19 Motion to Stay, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/15/18. CASE STAYED. (Gonzalez, R)
February 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for Action to Proceed on Cognizable Excessive Force Claims Against Individual Defendants and to Dismiss Official Capacity Claims with Prejudice, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/12/2018. (Martin-Gill, S)
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff proceed against Defendants Stewart, Castillo and Ventura in their individual capacities on a Eighth Amendment excessive force claim for damages; Plaintiff's official capacity claims be dis missed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted re 9 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Quincy Mosley ; referred to Judge Drozd,signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/21/17. Objections to F&R due by 12/11/2017 (Martin-Gill, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mosley v. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quincy Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?