Wise v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
| Elizabeth Wise |
| Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00853 |
| June 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Erica P. Grosjean |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Awarding Attorneys' Fees, Costs and Incentive Payments re 49 & 51 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/26/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (Doc. No. 42 ) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/21/2019. Final Approval of Class Action Settlement set for 12/17/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Thorp, J)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATION and ORDER as follows: The Court grants the Parties' stipulation to stay all deadlines, including trial, as set forth in the minute orders (ECF Nos. 27 , 28 ) pending approval of the settlement of the consolidated cases and, if no such approval is granted, then all of the deadlines, including trial, will be re-calendared based on the date of denial of the motion for preliminary approval. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/13/2019. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
35
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/9/2018. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/6/18. Lead Case: 1:17-cv-00853-DAD-EPG; Member Case: 1:18-cv-00750-DAD-BAM. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Joint Stipulation Setting Deadline and Hearing Date for Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/12/2018. (It is hereby ordered that the parties shall submit the settlement agreement for preliminary approval by 6/29/2018, and that the hearing for preliminary approval of the settlement agreement shall be 8/7/2018, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Approving Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint 13 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/21/17. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wise v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Wise | |
| Represented By: | John Paul Briscoe |
| Represented By: | William J Gorham, III |
| Represented By: | Nicholas John Scardigli |
| Represented By: | Robert Joshua Wasserman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
