Rice v. Velasquez et al
| Kordy Rice |
| S. Velasquez, V. Resendez, Briones and Gryce/Bryce |
| 1:2017cv00867 |
| June 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER REGARDING Two 32 33 Stipulations of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/28/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Discharging Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as to Inmate Kordy Rice, CDCR #V-43736 27 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/26/2019. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Kordy Rice for Settlement Conference on March 26, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8(BAM) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/26/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and STAYING Case for 120 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/14/2019: Settlement Conference set for 3/26/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER for INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-1305 CKD) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0867 SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/29/17. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
