Kolb v. Telling et al
| Kyle Kolb |
| David Telling and Wakecraft Boats II, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00957 |
| July 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/25/2018. Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment be GRANTED IN PART; (2) Judgment be entered in Pla intiff's favor and against Defendants; (3) Plaintiff be awarded liquidated damages totaling $112,179.43 as of May 25, 2018, and this amount increase each day by $23.29 until judgment is entered; (4) Plaintiff be awarded $25,415.00 in restitution; (5) Plaintiff be awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $4,520.00; (6) Plaintiff be awarded costs in the amount of $454.00; (7) Plaintiff be awarded pre-judgment interest totaling $20,521.62 as of May 25, 2018, and t his amount increase each day by $25.62 until judgment is entered; and (8) Plaintiff be awarded post judgment interest as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), which shall accrue from the time of entry of judgment until the judgment is satisfied in full. Objections due within 14 days of service. (Valdez, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
