Bagsby v. Montgomery

Petitioner: Jasper Lee Bagsby
Respondent: W.L. Montgomery
Case Number: 1:2017cv01048
Filed: August 7, 2017
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 5, 2018 23 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be Granted and the Habeas Corpus Petition be Dismissed with Prejudice for Petitioner's Failure to Comply with 28:2244(d)'s one year limitation period re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jasper Lee Bagsby, 12 MOTION to DISMISS filed by W.L. Montgomery ; referred to Judge O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/5/2018. Objections to F&R due by 3/29/2018 (Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bagsby v. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jasper Lee Bagsby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W.L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?