Smith v State of California [CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation]

Plaintiff: Earlene Smith
Defendant: State of California [California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
Case Number: 1:2017cv01058
Filed: August 8, 2017
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Fresno Office
County: Madera
Referring Judge: Stanley A. Boone
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 20, 2017 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER VACATING November 1, 2017 Hearing on Defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/19/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v State of California [CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earlene Smith
Represented By: Che Lewellyn Hashim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California [California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]
Represented By: Tamara Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?