Ordaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Olga Ordaz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2017cv01141
Filed: August 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $10,449.75 in attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and Plaintiff's counsel shall compensate Plaintiff in the amount of $1,928.95 for fees previously awarded pursuant to the EAJA. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/5/2020; (Timken, A)
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION to voluntary remand pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to entry of judgment for Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/15/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER for award and payment of attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/15/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER to Voluntary REMAND Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment for Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/23/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of 2 Days for Defendant to File Her Response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief: that Defendant shall have a two-day extension of time to July 20, 2018, to file a response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/19/2018. (Herman, H)
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of 30 Days for Defendant to File her Opposition to Plaintiff's Opening Brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/19/2018. Based on the parties' stipulation, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time to July 18, 2018, to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. All other deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. No further extensions of time shall be granted absent a showing of good cause. (Valdez, E)
August 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/25/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ordaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Olga Ordaz
Represented By: Melissa Newel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jennifer A. Kenney, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?