Thompson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Charles - Thompson, Jr. |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., World Savings Bank, FSB and Bank of New York Mellon |
1:2017cv01200 |
September 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Sheila K. Oberto |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this case should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. Matter referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/1/2018. (Timken, A) |
Filing 16 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Recommended For Dismissal. By no later than July 31, 2018, Plaintiff shall file proof service or a statement showing cause why the Court should not recommend to the presiding district court judge that this action be dismissed. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/23/2018. (Timken, A) |
Filing 13 ORDER RE: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 5 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/23/2018: The Wells Fargo Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and World Savings Bank, FSB are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Hellings, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.