United States of America v. Briseno
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Cynthia Briseno
Case Number: 1:2017cv01288
Filed: September 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Vacating Hearing and Closing Case 31 , 32 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/21/2018. (Hellings, J)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Following Hearing on Remedies for Respondent Cynthia Briseno's Civil Contempt, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/27/2018. (Gaumnitz, R)
April 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Finding Respondent in Civil Contempt of Orders filed January 18, 2018 and March 16, 2018, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/2018. (1. The court finds respondent Cynthia Briseno in civil contempt of this court for her failure to co mply with the court's orders (Doc. Nos 11 , 16 ); 2. A bench warrant for the arrest of respondent Cynthia Briseno shall issue; and 3. Following arrest, respondent Cynthia Briseno is to be brought before this court for hearing on the remedies for her civil contempt.)(Gaumnitz, R)
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Regarding Civil Contempt, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/15/2018. (Show Cause Hearing set for 4/17/2018, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Respondent is hereby notified that a failure to comply with this order will subject respondent to possible further sanctions for contempt of court.)(Gaumnitz, R)
January 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER adopting 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, enforcing summons and directing Respondent to appear at a time to be set by the investigating Revenue Officer signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/17/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
December 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS re: I.R.S. Summons Enforcement. Matter referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/8/2017. (Timken, A)
October 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT. Show Cause Hearing set for 11/29/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/2/2017. (Timken, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Briseno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, cv
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cynthia Briseno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?